November 2nd, 2001
Mood: cheerful
I attend the 9th best university in the nation, which prides itself on being a haven for intellectuals and those who love to learn. And don't misunderstand, it is. After all, there's some reason that students come here who were offered full rides at state schools and elsewhere - and it sure isn't name recognition (though the sting of this wears off with time). But despite this pervading aura of deep thought, academia, and intellectualism, stupidity remains.
U of C students know what I mean. In every class, there is at least one person doing their part to carry a torch for ignorance, even here. They come in a couple different forms. There is the inane question-asker. Inane question-askers interrupt our prize-winning professors with useless inquiries like "When is the final?" or "What's the reading assignment for next class?"; information that could be learned by even the most perfunctory glance at the syllabus. Or they might ask for information that's totally irrelevant to the class and could easily be learned in one's free time. Hello? Heard of Google? Or InfoPlease? It takes less than 5 seconds, and the littlest activity, to look these things up on your own time. Please, don't use our instructors as bare-effort encyclopedias.
Then there are people that generally pop up in discussion classes, abstract endless-talkers. When these first get going, it seems like a good thing, because the conversation might have begun to lag - or is having a hard time getting started. But as they continue to speak, you realize two things: First, they aren't really saying anything. Or maybe they are, but it's so off-topic that you're wondering where they got the notion it's appropriate to discuss at this particular time. And second, they aren't stopping. You start to think "okay, this is about the time to start wrapping up," yet they continue on. It seems like eons pass. Students in class roll their eyes or fall asleep. Finally, the professor interrupts or class ends, and the atrocity stops. But the fear, the certainty they will begin again, remains.
Yet even these classmates of mine are assuredly brillant in some way, since they're here. And somehow, that makes it worse. On a semi-regular basis, I am being exposed to the stupidity of smart people. Their stupidity broadcasts at a much lower frequency than the stupidity of the general populace and, experienced concurrently with the latter, would go unnoticed. However, I am not in contact with the general populace on a regular basis. I am in contact with University of Chicago students. Any stupidity here, no matter how slight, stands out like a bright neon bulb. It's why we make fun of our friends and get made fun of ourselves, for tiny little stupidity slip-ups.
The problem with this is that our stupidity tolerance is being lowered, while at the same time our standards for intelligence are being raised. I used to jump for joy whenever I encountered anyone who seemed to think about things and attempted to express their thoughts, seeing this act as a sign of intellectual activity. My standards are higher now. Not only do I take it for granted that people think about things, but I expect them to be able to express themselves well too. And as far as stupidity goes, I find myself getting annoyed and frustrated with it more quickly and with more force than ever before, though I am able to mask it better.
In short, there are many different ways to be smart, but also many different ways to be stupid. And I'm finding that the many facets of the latter are becoming less bearable and more noticeable to me - no matter what form they might take.